Imajući na umu da je socijalna i duhovna kultura manjinskih naroda u novije vrijeme rijetko bila predmet interesovanja crnogorske etnologije, ovaj rad ukazuje na mogućnost da određeni elementi manjinskih etnologija ne dobiju adekvatan tretman u prvom Leksikonu etnologije Crne Gore. Polaznu teorijsku osnovu analitičko-interpretativnog dijela rada predstavljaju ideje o inkluzivnom karakteru Registra nematerijalne kulturne baštine, koje u svojim radovima predlaže, razvija i obrazlaže antropolog Miloš Milenković. Iako su principi formiranja Registra NKB i izrade LECG znatno različiti, oba dokumenta bave se tradicionalnim etnološkim temama. Stoga, analiza određenih paralela u procesu izrade ova dva dokumenta mogla bi da bude značajna u kontekstu dolaska do inkluzivnog karaktera Leksikona. Potencijalna ograničenja u vezi sa obradom odrednica vezanih za manjinske etnologije demonstrirana su na primjeru orijentalnog nasljeđa i socijalne i duhovne kulture Bošnjaka/Muslimana i Albanaca. Na kraju rada predložene su preporuke u cilju prevazilaženja mogućih prepreka i obezbjeđivanja inkluzivnog karaktrea LECG, koji bi bio prilagođen društvenom, kulturnom i identitetskom kontekstu Crne Gore.Having in mind that Montenegrin ethnology has rarely approached social and spiritual culture of minority peoples, in this paper I express my concern that the first Lexicon of Ethnology of Montenegro might neglect important elements of minority ethnologies. The concept of Inclusive List of Intangible Cultural Heritage, promoted and developed by Miloš Milenković, is the starting theoretical point of the analytical-interpretative part of the paper. Although the principles of forming the List of ICH and drafting the Lexicon of Ethnology differ in many aspects, both documents treat traditional ethnological topics. The analysis of certain parallels in the process of drafting these two documents could be significant in the context of reaching the inclusive character of the Lexicon of Ethnology of Montenegro. Expected limitations regarding minority ethnologies are demonstrated on the example of the oriental cultural heritage and social and spiritual culture of Bosnians / Muslims and Albanians in Montenegro. At the end of the paper, I propose recommendations on how to overcome expected obstacles and ensure the inclusive character of LECG, which would be in line with the social, cultural and identity context of Montenegro